|
Please find attached fax to Lord Hoffman from me last April. I wrote to him 4 times between
April and September 2004 before learning that he had been moved to the Law Lords. He was my barrister in 1980.
To:
Ms Begum / Deputy Master at the RCJ Civil Appeals Court
From: Yolande Lindridge, Little Caring Farm, Caring Road. Leeds,
Kent ME17 1TH
5.4.2004 By fax to: 0207 947 6740
Yolande Lindridge v Nigel Anthony Peck
(Appeal)
After 2 months I acknowledge that it is impossible for me to obtain from the Maidstone County Court the
Order you requested in relation to my application of 8.5.2003 to enforce the Undertaking / Maidstone Court Order of 5.8.80.
Ever
since I made the application of 8.5.2003, the Maidstone County Court uses either security guards or Kent Police to intimidate
me. I went to the Maidstone County Court twice to try and get the Court Order, but after being intimidated and reduced
to tears, I am not going back.
I am not permitted access to any of my files in this matter, although Nigel Peck is.
My
solicitor, Jason Halsey at Constanti Shah is trying to get access to the file. I have asked the Lord Chancellor's Office
/ the Court Service if they could get a Copy of the Order in relation the application of 8.5.2003. There was no Hearing
of this Application. There was a Hearing of a different Application on 6.6.2003 and the Maidstone County Court
will supply me CJ Mitchell's Order arising out of this second application, but not CJ Mitchell's Order out of the first application.
I
have also started Judicial Review Proceedings requesting this Court Order for you, as well as the transcript of a tape in
a medical accident case (CR005220) heard in the Maidstone County Court on 24.7.2001 as DJ Burgess was heard to say to me "If
we want you to lose, you will lose" and I am currently facing my second fake bankruptcy/ asset stripping in a double jeopardy
case for the same medical accident. I have had today been forced to progress the Permission to Appeal case 'suspended'
in the RCJ Civil Appeal Office due to Kent Police seizing key documents and Maidstone County Court refusing to hand over key
documents in that matter as well.
In the AS202262 Permission to Appeal Case, Kent Police stole from my home all copies
of my files in this matter on 11.5.2003, and Maidstone County Court refused me access to the court files to complete the bundles
required for a Hearing before Mr Justice Douglas Brown on 14.11.2003; I lost my case because of the combined efforts
of Peck's solicitors, the Maidstone County Court and Kent Police to with-hold key documents required for the Hearing.
I complained to the Lord Chancellor's office last November that 6 security guards were used to intimidate me when I asked
in the Maidstone County Court for access to my court file to complete my bundle.
On 5.8.80, my barrister Mr Hoffman
obtained for me a Court Order / Undertaking to protect me for life from the 'Control Freak' / Violent Psychopath that I was
married to ie Nigel Peck, this order covered his agents too.
What was the point of my barrister, Mr Hoffman, obtaining
life-long protection for me from Nigel Peck and his agents, if this 'control freak' has progressed to using Kent Police and
the Maidstone County Court as his agents?
Is Mr Hoffman, now Lord Hoffman in the Court of Appeal? What will he
make of what has been going on in Kent in contempt of his work, and the blatant breaches of my Human Rights by public authorities
in Kent?
Perhaps if Lord Hoffman asks CJ Mitchell what happened to the Hearing for Enforcement Proceedings,
served on Nigel Peck by the Maidstone County Court bailiff on 9.5.2003, I might be able to progress the matter currently 'stuck'
in the Court of Appeal because the Maidstone County Court will not produce the order in relation to the application of 8.5.2003?
The
Maidstone County Court Bailiff served the enforcement application of 8.5.2003 on Nigel Peck on 9.5.2003; Nigel Peck's
response was to phone DC Benson and to send him to my home on 9.5.2003, 10.5.2003 and 11.5.2003 to injure me, to unlawfully
remove court files and papers needed in my 2 High Court permission to appeal cases ie my medical accident case and my case
against him, to gain unlawful access to my home, to seize special procedure material without a warrant, to seize excluded
material without a warrant, to put me out of business etc.
When I asked the Maidstone County Court for a Hearing of
the 8.5.2003 application, CJ Mitchell tried to persuade me to go to a private meeting with him at the Canterbury Court.
I would not go. Sometime last May he was taken off the Circuit and criminal cases and grounded to the Canterbury County
Court, why, I have no idea.
Perhaps if Lord Hoffman asks DC Benson of Kent Police, why if he was going about his lawful
business he was so easily rebuffed and went away on 9 & 10 May 2003, before arresting me on 11 May 2003? Perhaps
Lord Hoffman can ask DC Benson why when he was shown a copy of the Order/ the Undertaking obtained for me by Mr Hoffman, he
acted in contempt of the Maidstone County Court Order?
The attached Court Order of 27.6.2003 is one of 3 versions of
orders arising from the Hearing of a different application on 6.6.2003. Although he was grounded to the Canterbury Court,
the Hearing before CJ Mitchell on 6.6.2003 took place in the Maidstone County Court - so I do not understand how he can say
'sitting at Canterbury County Court.' The Order is grossly inaccurate because when CJ Mitchell could not persuade
me to undermine the RCJ Permission to Appeal case ie Lindridge v Peck, he had me arrested and put in the Court Cells for the
day, under threat of 3 days in Holloway Prison, a 28 day section order and the threat of Miss Pearson, the Official Solicitor:-
1
I was not detained for a psychiatric examination. I did issue 2 Maidstone sealed witness summonses ie to DC Benson &
DCI Corbishley, but they did not turn up. DC Benson arrested me on 4.7.2003 and charged me with forgery in relation
his witness summons. I pleaded 'not guilty' to forgery and the matter was transferred to the Maidstone Crown Court.
In September the forgery charges were dropped as in a transcript of the Hearing of 6.6.2003, CJ Mitchell twice stated that
the Witness Summonses was genuine. There was no contempt of court as there was no court order about not issuing Witness
Summonses, and I had issued 2 Witness Summonses on 21.1.2003 and CJ Mitchell did not say that they were contempt of court.
On 6.6.2003, I unlawfully spent in excess of 6 hours in the custody of the Maidstone Courts. I spent the time preparing
my defence for the barrister CJ Mitchell paid for to represent me, as he had barred me from representing myself. I had
to sit behind the barrister so that CJ Mitchell could not see me.
2 CJ Mitchell contacted the Official Solicitor, but she
did not support CJ Mitchell's intentions and I was released from custody.
3 My detention was unlawful; CJ Mitchell
had treated me in court like an animal. DC Benson supported CJ Mitchell on 4.7.2003 by imposing bail conditions preventing
me from attending a Maidstone Court Hearing on 17.7.2003 for fear of imprisonment. The Hearing on 17.7.2003 arose out
of an Order of 8.4.2003 by DJ Armstrong from Sussex; Peck was ordered to comply with this order by 12.5.2003, but instead
he had me arrested and no one at the Maidstone County Court minded that he was in contempt of DJ Armstrong's Order.
I lost my case on 17.7.2003 because I could not attend due to bail conditions. In December 2003, Judicial Review papers
were posted to Peck according to the law of this land; Peck phoned DC Benson and asked for me to removed from my home
and my children and placed in Holloway Police. I was unlawfully removed from my home and imprisoned for 25 days.
The RCJ Administrative Court have confirmed that my imprisonment was unlawful and that bail conditions could not bar me from
pursuing lawful legal actions, but for my own protection the conditions imposed by a London judge sitting in a Kent Court
state that I pursue these actions via the High Court and not in Kent. The RCJ Administrative Court has processed a Judicial
Review action against the Kent Courts, Maidstone County Court, Kent CPS and Kent Police. The Kent Messenger Group is
also included in the action as they publicly ridiculed me in support of Peck after the Hearing of 5.8.80 at which I was represented
by Mr Hoffman; the Kent Messenger publicly ridiculed me in January this year in contempt of court / in support of Peck
and in contempt of official guidelines laid down by the Attorney General in such matters.
4 I did not go anywhere near
CJ Mitchell on 16.6.2003, instead I was proceeded with the RCJ Hearing in the same matter on 13.6.2003 in Court 37;
the Judge was very kind to me as was Peck's barrister, who spoke for me because I was too frightened to speak. I did
not indicate to CJ Mitchell that I would see my GP because I have not had a GP since my GP, Dr Godsmark 'struck off
me and my children' on 8.10.2001 over medical records and breach of patient confidentiality re: Peck.
DCI Corbishley
is no longer working for Kent Police, he was in charge of a 'Rape, Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert investigation ie SI/CZ/119/2003.
On 14.3.2003 I was interviewed as a Witness in this investigation, I co-operated fully and supplied corroborative evidence
re: all the allegations. 2 months later the tables were turned on me as I was arrested instead of the criminals.
This investigation has evidence of breaches of the data protection act in relation to my medical and police records in relation
to Peck.
My best friend is Jewish, and I had a fair Hearing on 30.10.2003 before Master Simon. I lived with a
Jewish landlady for 2 years and I was proud when she referred to me as her third daughter, however Peck has some Jewish medical-legal
protectors who have no morals, no ethics or scruples. I understand that the majority of Jewish people have decent family
values and would disapprove of these Kent rogues.
What would my barrister, Mr Hoffman, think about what has happened
since the 1980 Court Order/ Undertaking to protect me from this 'control freak'? This 'control freak' now controls Kent
Courts, solicitors, doctors, police, freemasons and the CPS.
I don't believe that was the intention of my barrister,
Mr Hoffman.
I believe that the Court of Appeal would find listening to the following Maidstone County Court tapes highly
entertaining ie the CJ Mitchell tapes in AS202262 of 7.1.2003, 10.1.2003, 21.1.2003 and 6.6.2003 - and also DJ Burgess's tape
of 24.7.2001 in CR005220. Please also listen to the Permission to Appeal Hearing of 14.11.2003 (Lindridge v Peck) before
Mr Justice Douglas Brown; you will hear that Permission failed because Kent Police had taken and with-held the key paperwork
on 11.5.2003 and Maidstone County Court told me that they did not have it either. Whilst I was in Holloway Prison ie
on 13.1.2004, DC Benson returned to me one of my copies of the documents that Mr Justice Douglas Brown had wanted 2 months
earlier.
Kent has tried very hard to stop me from prosecuting Peck for 2 rapes ie mine and another woman's, plus other
various criminal offences.
Kent has tried very hard to stop me from enforcing the 1980 undertaking / court order.
Certainly
Peck has many agents who are not phased by being in contempt of this Court Order. Medical records were badly forged
between 18 July 2001 and 25 July 2001 to protect Peck from any rape allegations, why did Peck's chums need to do that?
Aren't the Royal Courts of Justice capable of deciding medical accident and rape cases without interference from Kent Police
and the Maidstone County Court?
I understand that there is a phrase 'scandalising the judiciary'; I suspect that
CJ Mitchell's and DJ Burgess's tapes give a whole new meaning to this. But I do appreciate that it is not just
my life that the Maidstone County Court likes to play games with, but decent freemasons too who have been targeted by a Kent
freemason asset-stripping ring eg freemason, Malcolm Denyer / Money Movement Ltd.
If your Lord Hoffman, was my barrister,
Mr Hoffman, on 5.8.80 - please can you show this document to him as I am sure that he will be horrified at the flagrant Human
Rights Breaches in the Maidstone County Court? The Maidstone Courts have got an appalling reputation in
Kent. My friend is the Child Protection for Maidstone, she was the Consultant paediatrician on Lord Laming's Victoria
Climbie Inquiry - I understand that child protection doctors get vilified in these courts as I have done. She told me
last night that her phone gets tapped as mine is tapped. Kent Police are tapping my phone, so are Kent Police tapping
her phone too?
Please can you help this matter progress?
Enc
|
