EXPOSING CORRUPTION IN COLWYN BAY, CONWY, NORTH WALES AND SURROUNDING AREAS
D I GARY SMITH 19/11/03
WELCOME
SHARON ANN KILBY'S STORY
CORRUPTION, GREED AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER
ADVICE FOR VICTIMS
JOE STIRLING'S SECOND FAMILY AND WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP LIFT THE VEIL
SPIRITUAL MESSAGES
DIARY OF A YEAR IN THE LIFE OF A SINGLE MOTHER
FOR CRYIN' OUT LOUD
LINKS
CONTACT ME
UK POLITICAL PRISONER NORMAN SCARTH
YOLANDE ANN LINDRIDGE
MAUREEN

                                                                                                Little Caring Farm

                                                                                                Caring Road

                                                                                                Leeds

                                                                                                Kent  ME17 1TH

DI Gary Smith 7362

Kent Police

Professional Standards Dept

Force Headquarters

Sutton Road

Maidstone ME15 9BZ

 

Your ref:  IX02, 0639 JF/SP

 

By fax to:  01622 652319

 

CC       Paula Andrew, Home Office Policing Organised Crime Unit

            DAC Michael Fuller, Metropolitan Police

            Grand Secretary of the United Grand Lodge of England

            Acting Supt Steve Corbishley Maidstone Police Station

            General Medical Council /The Shipman Inquiry

            The Attorney General

 

19 November 2003

 

 

 

 

Dear DI Smith 

 

Home Office Letter of 7.10.2003   SI/CZ/119/2003   & The Shipman Inquiry

 

On 9.10.2003 I faxed a letter to you that I had received from the Home Office Policing Organised Crime Unit.  At that time I advised you I had left the latest Child Porn advertisements found on www.medical-accident.co.uk for Kent Police to investigate, I now understand that Kent Police have investigated but have decided not to prosecute the distributor of Child Porn & Incest Videos for placing unauthorised adverts on www.medical-accident.co.uk.  Please can you justify your decision, I am not satisfied with the reasoning of Supt Ross in a letter to myself and the Home Office Policing Organised Crime Unit, ie that all offences I report are to be considered as harassment of my ex-husband, Nigel Peck.

 

I have received several complaints from inside and outside of Kent about this pervert placing these adverts on our site, the people I have spoken with agree that the offences under the Children’s Act need a permanent solution ie an arrest, not a ‘cover-up’.

Are the adverts trying to undermine our patient or child work, or both?.

 

There is another web-site which is very similar to ours – and indeed we work together.  Patients have pointed out to me that Dr Rita Pal’s web-site www.nhs-exposed.co.uk does not suffer like mine, and therefore this paedophile is waging a personal vendetta against our work/me.  Please can you arrest this paedophile and charge him with offences under the Children’s Act – hopefully by doing so, you will bring down a whole paedophile video production and distribution ring?

 

I understand that you refuse to deal with my complaints against rogue police officers who have committed criminal acts against me, are you in any way related to the DI Smith at Maidstone Police Station who seems to have been connected to some of the activities I have complained of to you.  DC Michaela Warrell told me in April 2001 that DI Smith went down to Longport Police Station about me and spoke with Special Branch.  We assumed for my protection, but it was not – for whose protection?

 

Having been to Longport Police Station, and having been interviewed there on 13.12.2002 by both Kent Police & Special Branch, I am aware that they look the same – the only difference is that Sgt Grimmett gave me his name and number and the Special Branch woman only gave me her number.

 

Are the rogue police officers who have been committing criminal offences at my home employed by Kent Police or by Special Branch, or both?  Who do I complain to about Special Branch?

 

On 13.12.2002, 2 Witnesses from Peri Led and Eurotunnel were also interviewed, and it was known that I would be returning to Eurotunnel on 20.12.2002.  The visits to Eurotunnel on 13.12.2002 and 20.12.2002 were so that I could run and supervise a practical risk assessment examination.  The first examination on 13.12.2002 was for a general practical risk assessment, the second examination on 20.12.2002 for a for a practical construction risk assessment.

 

On my way to Eurotunnel / Longport on 20.12.2002, a missile was fired at my car and narrowly missed the windscreen.  I was so distressed by the incident that the second practical risk assessment examination for our Construction Safety Students was delayed for some time, and I was in no fit state to supervise / take part in the practical risk assessment examination.  Sgt Grimmett ‘covered-up’ the incident of the man at Maidstone firing a missile from the vicinity of the safety platform at J7 as I headed down the M20 to run the practical examination.

 

On 20.12.2002 Sgt Grimmett did tell me that I had a ‘result’ and should be pleased, and that DI Smith knew that I had been suffering at the hands of my ex-husband Nigel Peck for 22 years and that he would see me in the New Year.  I got no reply to my question as to why nothing had been done for 22 years, but was reassured that waiting for a further few weeks was minor in comparison.  11 months have now gone by.

 

I asked Sgt Grimmett if it was the same DI Smith who have come to see them and had terrified me, he said no that it was another DI Smith in Professional Standards.  Are you related?  You are only about 26/28 and cannot have known about what has been going on in Maidstone Police Station since 1980, whereas the other DI Smith told me has been working there for many years since his children were very young.

 

If you are related, is there a conflict of interest?

 

Was the missile fired at my car for any particular reason on that day?  It terrified me and the practical Construction Risk Assessment Examination nearly did not take place, and in any case it was significantly delayed – and in the process I lost my passport which I had to taken to leave there for identification /security purposes.

 

I returned to Longport a few days later as my out-of-date passport had been found,

I left with Sgt Grimmett a complete copy of my Health & Safety database ie 5,000 names, and full contact details and records, dates etc.  On 11.5.2003, Kent Police seized all copies of this database when they arrested me at my home.

 

Mr Justice Douglas Brown explained to me last Friday in the High Court that I had made the wrong application in the High Court to get my Property back from Kent Police and that I should Appeal the Order of 8.7.2003 and take the matter into the Court of Appeal.  This is what is now happening.

 

I was handicapped in the Court Hearing because of the reluctance of the Maidstone County Court to supply key documents for the Hearing and I was barred access to Lindridge v Peck file in the Maidstone County Court by both the Court and Peck.

On 17.3.2003, the Maidstone Court manager wrote a letter for me to give to Kent Police giving them permission to access my case files stored there, why then did you have to seize all my copies of my case files in my home and on my computers?

 

Why are the only persons permitted to access my case files judges, county court staff, Kent Police and Nigel Peck?

 

I wish to report to Kent Police / Metropolitan Police that someone accessed the High Court File in Lindridge v Peck, in July 2003 and removed all the Maidstone County Court sealed Witness Summonses in the case (including one to Kent Police).  Whoever removed the Witness Summonses, also took the accompanying questionnaires and the Maidstone County Court refused to fax copies of these questionnaires in their files.  (see attached letter)

 

The Maidstone County Court file in Lindridge v Peck is now in the High Court and I intend to fully examine its contents to see if anything has been removed, I will do this in front of High Court staff as Witnesses.

 

As Kent Police have unlawfully seized the legally privileged files and computers needed for my case, please can they either run copies of the questionnaires from my computers or simply return to me one set of the multiple copies they seized?

 

Mr Justice Douglas Brown explained to me what I had to do to Appeal the 3 orders of  

CJ Mitchell arising out of the Maidstone Court Hearing on 6.6.2003.  This has been done as it was not part of the Hearing last Friday.

 

It has also been explained to me that I made the wrong application at the onset of Lindridge v Peck in AS202262 and that I should have appealed the order of 5.8.80.

Appealing the order of 1980, takes the matter directly into the Court of Appeal.

 

Mr Justice Douglas Brown only dealt with the Court Orders of CJ Mitchell from January 2003.  Mr Justice Douglas Brown has advised me that the Order of 5.8.80 is still valid.  Since January 2003 there is substantial evidence of breaches of the Order of 5.8.80 by Peck, his agents and servants.

I had difficulty in court last Friday because Kent Police had seized on 11.5.2003 both my copies of the Civil Procedure Rules, as well as both of the my copies of the Human Rights Act.  Mr Justice Douglas Brown explained to me that I need these copies of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Human Rights Act as a central feature of my Appeal.  I am sure that the Kent Police Force Solicitor has access to these, so please may I have one of my copies back to prepare my Appeal?

I also learnt last Friday that the Hearing on 6.6.2003 in the Maidstone County Court should not have proceeded without Peck, Acting Supt Corbishley & DC Benson.

 

I wish to report to Kent Police / Metropolitan Police that there is evidence of 2 sets of Counterfeiting and Forgery in the Maidstone County Court File AS202262 now in the High Court Civil Appeals Office WG7, as follows:

 

1          My medical records ie entries in 1982 and 1987.  I would like to report that this was done when Patient Confidentiality was breached by the Bearsted Medical Practice, between 15.7.2001 and 25.7.2001.  For example there is a document that purports to come from a Hospital that had not yet been built!

           

DI Smith & Acting Supt Corbishley are aware of this as I was interviewed at Maidstone Police Station about it on 14.3.2003 (SI/CZ/119/2003).

 

I wish to advise that these medical records are also part of my 2nd Appeal from the Maidstone County Court ie Lindridge v BMI Somerfield Hospital

 

2          My divorce records ie documents in 1980 (I have been barred by the Maidstone County Court and Peck from accessing these files, but Kent Police have my written permission to access these files)

 

The counterfeiting and forgery relates to 1980 documents that I have seen and have copies of, and have supplied copies of to Maidstone Police Station on 18.3.2003, having been supplied with a copy for them by the Maidstone County Court.  What purports to be a 1980 court sealed document must be a forgery as it contains the Medway Court Seal.  In 1980 there was a Rochester Crown Court and a Chatham County Court, but the name ‘Medway’ was created some time later to encompass Rochester, Strood, Chatham and Gillingham.  I believe that this forged document was created at the same time as the medical records referred to above ie between 15.7.2001 and 25.7.2001.  

            Has someone stolen a Medway Court Seal?

 

This Forged and Counterfeited 1980 document is also in the SI/CZ/119/2003 file

 

Please can I ask why Kent Police charged me with Forgery and Counterfeiting offences involving a Maidstone County Court seal, when they have the evidence that doctors, solicitors, judges and my ex-husband committed offences?

 

Kent Police will also recall that I was not committed to the Maidstone Crown Court to face Counterfeiting & Forgery charges as CJ Mitchell would have had to have been called as a Witness for the defence, due to the transcript of the 6.6.2003,  in which he twice states that the Witness Summons I had issued to my arresting officer, DC Benson, are in fact genuine.  Why did DC Benson say that the Maidstone County Court sealed Witness Summons he had received was not genuine?  Why didn’t DC Benson listen to the Court tape?  Why didn’t Folkestone CPS listen to the Court tape?  Why did it take 3 months to get these ‘fake’ Forgery Charges dropped?

 

A founding partner at Furley Page is a former Naval Intelligence Officer called UHB Alexander, he is also a Grand Rank Freemason in Kent.  Please can you question him about his firm’s role in this matter, and his firm’s influence over other firms of solicitors and judges? Furley Page is based in Canterbury.  Who are the solicitors to the Province of East Kent masons?  McCabe Ford Williams are the accountants / auditors and I am aware of what they did in bringing down the Kent Chamber of Commerce and bouncing its small business creditors – in support of an intelligence gathering arm of the Province ie Business Link Kent.

 

Health & Safety Database – my pension / largest biggest asset

 

I have now been invited to be the Stakeholder representing Kent at a HSE Conference in Reigate on 26.11.2003.  The Conference wants to hear my views on a HSE Workplace Strategy from 2010.  As it will take sometime for the Hearing in the Court of Appeal, please can you ask Longport Police Station (Kent Police / Special Branch) to return the copy I left with them of my Health & Safety database please?

 

I wish to send faxes to all 5,000 names on my database asking for their views so that I can collate them for the Conference next week.

 

My database is an asset which had a commercial value of £150,000, I had spent 10 years nurturing and developing this database – it will have lost considerable value due to the fact that no work has been done to it for several months.  Last year I sent out 100,000 letters to Kent Businesses about serious Health & Safety issues, this year I have not sent out any due to the actions / refusal to act by Kent Police.  In order to maintain a business you need to communicate with your customers / clients, Kent Police have prevented me from communication with my clients, why?  This is in Breach of the Human Rights Act.

 

Maidstone Police’s Investigation SI/CZ/119/2003 into ‘Rapes, Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice’

 

On 9.10.2003 I wrote to you and asked:  “Please could you tell me the outcome of SI/CZ/119/2003 ie the Maidstone Police Investigation into Rapes, Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.  I have had no feedback from you since I was advised by Maidstone Police Station on 24.3.2003 that you were managing the investigation.  The position is now urgent as I am due in the Royal Courts of Justice on 14.10.2003 in Lindridge v Peck, and the High Court is expecting to know the situation.  Do you have enough evidence yet to prosecute Nigel Peck & others for rapes, perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice?  Additional information has been / is being supplied to Supt Corbishley.”

Please can you explain why I have had no response to my letter of 9.10.2003?

 

I also wrote on 9.10.2003:  “I am due in the Ashford Magistrates Courts on 16.10.2003 accused of harassing my alleged rapist / perjurer ie Peck etc, but my solicitor told me before the last hearing on 18.9.2003 that there was not enough evidence to warrant a prosecution as there was only one Witness Statement from Peck himself from when he attended Ashford Police Station on 3.7.2003.  What is the situation?  When will the acting Chief Constable reply to my letter as he was asked to do by the Home Office in August 2003?”

 

The Ashford Magistrates told me on 16.10.2003 to report Peck’s perjury in his Witness Statement of 3.7.2003 upon which the whole Ashford Magistrates Court double jeopardy situation is now based. On 16.10.2003 I phoned Kent Police as instructed and was told that they refuse to record evidence of perjury by Nigel Peck and so will also send an e-mail to DI Smith.  Please DI Smith, what have you done about the perjury Kent Police reported to you on 16.10.2003 and the evidence I supplied to you and that Kent Police has in the documents seized?

 

I also wrote on 9.10.2003:  “I wish to complain about Ashford Police, and Supt West, the Officer in Charge of Ashford Police Station, as the evidence suggests that Peck is the one who is harassing me and is using Ashford Police to do the harassment;  this is of course in breach of the Committal to Prison Option / Order that the courts gave me for my protection against Peck.  The order made on 5.8.80 was open-ended because it was considered necessary by the QC in charge of the proceedings.”  Please can you tell me what you have done about this since 9.10.2003?

 

I also wrote on 9.10.2003:  “I wish to complain on behalf of all victims of rape and domestic violence in Kent;  I think that the way that Kent Police and the Kent Messenger treats victims of rape and domestic violence, stinks.  I will do my best to encourage all victims of rape and domestic violence to report their crimes to Patient Support in the first instance, and then when we know that Kent Police will not automatically take the side of the man in the incident, then perhaps it will be safe for alleged victims to report crimes of rape and domestic violence to Kent Police.

 

The greatest fear of any victim of rape / domestic violence is that they police will not believe them and that by reporting it the abuse worsens;  after a report has been made to the police the next greatest fear is that the victim will be publicly ridiculed and undermined in the media.  I believe that in my case, Kent Police have overwhelmingly proved that they cannot be trusted in cases of rape / domestic violence where the perpetrator of that abuse is either a freemason and/or a member of the Upper Classes.”

 

Why are Nigel Peck and Nigel Harvey permitted to rape in Maidstone?  I asked Insp Simon Black about this in September 2002 when he was at Rochester Police Station.  At that time Insp Black was acting as the representative of the Chief Constable, now I understand he works in the Office for the Acting Chief Constable.

 

I also wrote on 9.10.2003:  The Kent Police approach to domestic violence, rape and child abuse is an international disgrace.  It is not ok to treat me like an animal, bugger me, attack me and my family, stalk me and make my life hell via the freemason movement.

 

I find it unbelievable that Kent Police consulted with my abuser about the crime he wanted me charged with and the sentence he wanted me to serve.  I can recall saying to a PC transporting me from Maidstone to Ashford Police Station that the next thing Kent Police will be doing, is to consult with the rapist of the 10 year-old girl in Ashford on 15.11.2001 and ask his opinion as to what she should be charged with!

This PC voiced the opinion that the 10 year-old girl will never get over her rape ordeal;  I disagreed with him, for as long as she sees justice being done and gets the right support for herself – she can overcome what has happened to her and leave her pain the past, where it belongs.  The longer it takes to get justice and support the longer the little girl will have to live with pain.”   

 

It is not OK for Sgt Grimmett to tell me on 20.12.2002 that Kent Police know what my ex-husband has been doing to me for 22 years.  When is Kent Police going to respect me, my children and our rights under the Human Rights Act?

 

Witness Summonses issued to Kent Police by me to attend the Maidstone Court

 

1          The Chief Constable ignored a Witness Summons served on him on 8.8.2002 to attend the Maidstone County Court on 15.8.2002 and instead I was fined £242 and my licence endorsed for allegedly going 2mph above the speed limit which had recently been reduced on a 2 lane road from 70mph down to 50mph

The Chief Constable was supposed to attend court in my medical accident case re:  a suspicious car incident on 20.2.2002 which has left me permanently disabled;  the police investigation into my medical accident etc.

I object to the vindictive Kent Police response

 

2            Catherine West in the Kent Police Serious Crime Squad was Witness Summonsed to attend the Maidstone County Court on 10.1.2003 to supply evidence re a rape investigation, she did not attend.  Why not?

            Why didn’t Catherine West even complete the questionnaire she was sent?

 

3          Acting Supt Corbishley and DC Benson were witness summonsed to attend the Maidstone County Court on 6.6.2003 to stop the wasting of public money in the Ashford Police Investigation.  Neither Benson nor Corbishley attended.

Instead on 4.7.2003, I am arrested by Benson and charged with fake charges of forgery.  I object to the vindictive Kent Police response.

 

 

Why is the area covered by Maidstone Police Station a safe area to commit crimes against me and my children?

 

Eg  numerous car incidents – the more serious being September 1993, May 1998, February 2002, December 2002, January 2003 and July 2003 (my son).

 

When are the Maidstone Police going to investigate the 2 car incidents involving my son / car tyres ie on 27.6.2003 whilst I was in Ashford Police custody in the William Harvey Hospital and on 25.7.2003 when my son was nearly killed in a Head-on car crash involving a changed faulty tyre.  This incident happened the day after I sent a press release to the Kent Messenger letting them know that I had pleaded not guilty in the Ashford Magistrates Courts that day and as part of police discovery I would have to be given access to the Kent Operation Ore list.  Please can I have access to the Kent Police Operation Ore list, I am a Litigant in Person in the criminal charges that Kent Police have brought against me for harassment?

 

I am aware that I am not the only person whom Kent Police have charged with fake harassment charges.  Derek Harding, Chairman of the Kent & Maidstone & Malling neighbourhood watches has also been charged with the same offence. Is that what Kent Police call ‘Intelligence-Led policing’?

 

66 Witness Statements taken from my home by Kent Police on 11.5.2003

 

Fortunately Kent Police did not find all of them and I still have some, I have written to the remaining people explaining what Kent Police has been up to and asking them to send me copies to file in my defence in the Ashford Magistrates Courts.  Am I right to suspect that the Witnesses that Kent Police / the Kent Messenger have ‘found’ for the 2 day Hearing in the Canterbury Magistrates Courts are probably all those un-convicted perverts / paedophiles on the Kent Operation Ore list, or freemason chums?

We are looking forward to knowing the identities of these Witnesses.

 

The Shipman Inquiry

 

The Shipman Inquiry Legal team have been supplied with my complaint to the GMC, by the GMC, under the powers the Inquiry Legal Team have via Section 1(1)(b) of the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921.  If the GMC had not handed over my Case File they would have been in contempt of court, and would have been punishable for contempt. The Shipman Inquiry is currently investigating ‘Confidentiality of Patient Data’ etc.

 

Whilst Kent Police officers from the Chief Constable downwards ignore me, the Home Office and the Maidstone County Court Witness Summonses served on them, I suspect that they would find it harder to ignore a subpoena from the Shipman Inquiry.

 

How will Kent Police explain their actions in the ‘cover-up’ of my medical accident case involving a 2nd Dr Rodney Ledward?  How will Kent Police explain why they ignored the information I gave them about the current address of Dr Rodney Ledward, who is wanted by them in connection with 60 rapes?  How will Kent Police explain their role in not investigating the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice file by doctors that I compiled at the request of Rochester Police in April 2002?  How will Kent Police explain their ‘cover-up’ of this 2nd Dr Rodney Ledward in Maidstone in their August 2001 and March 2003 investigation ie SI/CZ/119/2003?  How will Kent Police justify refusing to hand over these files of evidence about doctors conspiring to pervert the course of justice to the Shipman Inquiry Team?

 

It is my sincerest wish, that whilst Kent Police covered-up the criminal activities of Dr Rodney Ledward between 1980-1996, and in 2003 are still refusing to arrest him, that the Shipman Inquiry Team are able to bring Dr Ledward back and stop the 2nd ‘Dr Ledward’ after just 4 years as Kent Police clearly are motivated to ‘cover-up’ medical scandals.

 

The Police Officers involved in protecting criminals like Ledward, should be made to compensate the victims personally, before being stripped of their pensions.

Other Crimes

 

Since a security key has gone missing in my home (as reported to Sgt Wells in my cell on 27.6.2003 before a burglary happened there that day), my jewellery and my mother’s jewellery have now been taken.

 

In January 2003, the Kent Messenger published my first press release to them in many months, it was asking for my mother’s gold bracelet to be handed into Maidstone Police Station.  I heard that it was handed in – please can I have it back?

 

When I was being intimidated by Peck into handing over monies to him in May 2003, I offered him my jewellery and my mother’s jewellery.  I fear that he is about to intimidate me again into handing over monies, but I have not got the jewellery any more to offer him.  I have had insurance for 30 years, but this year I could not afford to renew the insurance due to the organised crime and this is the only time I have had possessions stolen.  I am aware that as the person had a key, and there was no forced entry I must suffer the loss.  Please can you record it as a crime, along with the theft of more files including my communications to you, MPs etc.

 

Phone tapping is unlawful, the evidence I have is that the unofficial visit by police to my home to intimidate my daughter at 5pm on 3.4.2003, was on the instructions of the Province of East Kent masons.  Yesterday I was reading to Malcolm Denyer a letter I faxed to the Grand Secretary of the United Lodge of England, as I was reading the title ie ‘Province of East Kent masons world-wide organised crime ring’ the person listening it dropped the phone and all sorts of strange things happened to the phones over the next few minutes.  When I was arrested and detained on 11.5.2003, 27.6.2003 and 4.7.2003 was it on the instructions of the Province of East Kent masons?

 

When I gave Acting Supt Corbishley on 18.3.2003 the possible identity of the rogue medical-legal lodge in Maidstone ie No 6069 The Bearsted Lodge, what did he do with the information?  I am aware that the Kent Police Safety Adviser (one of my ex-students) ie Malcolm Underdown is a member of one branch of the Bearsted Lodge.

Before Malcolm retired and retrained with us, he was Supt of Gravesend Police who manage the prosecution of drivers in car crashes.  Perhaps he could look at the evidence about the suspicious Gary Spraggan crash?  Do you want the evidence yet?

 

Interception of mail;  this was something Kent Police have yet to start investigating (since cz/8533/01) and the Kent Royal Mail refuse to investigate.  Please can you ask the Province of East Kent masons to stop interfering with my mail, as has been documented in various court proceedings over the past 2 years – their particular interest is letters from Court Offices as well as burglaries of Court Files /evidence.

Only today I received a letter (attached) from the Maidstone County Court dated 28.10.2003 and post-marked 28.10.2003.  Please can you ask the Royal Mail office in Maidstone to stop sitting on the mail, opening the mail and delivering the mail to the wrong address and not delivering some mail at all?

 

Nuisance calls, as Kent Police know I get lots of these.  A few months ago I actually caught someone who had forgotten to with-hold their number ie Giles Smith of Sandling, Maidstone of G-Forces web-management.  I had a nuisance call today at 11.05 which was witnessed.  Please can you tell me whether or not you have questioned Giles Smith?  He was found guilty in the Maidstone County Court in July 2002 of sabotaging my medical accident web-site.  Did the Kent Police Computer Crime Unit question him about the current sabotage of my web-site?

 

G-Forces Sandling Maidstone  Are Giles Smith & his father, who live next to the site of the 1980 Sandling Rape (Nigel Peck) any relation to DI Smith at Kent Professional Standards or DI Smith at Maidstone Police Station?  When I was at Sandling in December 2002, Giles Smith was making nuisance calls to Valentine Sholl-Taylor, one of my Sandling supporters.

 

What have the Smith family at Sandling got against me having friends in who know about the 1980 Sandling rape next door to their property?

 

How did an arrogant young University Graduate, with limited internet and business ability, but backed by his Daddy’s money – become such a huge overnight business success?  When I was first in Court with Giles Smith in 2001, his father was there with him, I overheard the father say “we’ll get the bitch this time.”  Well they didn’t get me and the case went in my favour and they were found guilty of sabotaging www..medical-accident.co.uk.   Please can Kent Police explain why they do not think that Giles Smith is behind the current sabotage and nuisance calls?

 

Kent Police or the Metropolitan Police or the Shipman Inquiry?

 

As the evidence for the more serious charges are in London and Kent, I am uncertain as to who they should be reported to and who should investigate them, so I am reporting them to all 3 legal groups.

 

The principle residence of one of the perpetrators of these crimes is London ie Nigel Peck, although he has a second home in Kent where his children live.  The police must know which police force should question him about his perjury etc?

 

Please can Kent Police stop ‘covering-up’ and starting ‘mopping-up’ unsolved crimes?   

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

 

Y A Lindridge (Mrs)

Founder of ‘Patient Support’

 

(Together reducing the risks for children and for patients)

 

 

Enc